“Can use of same language or changed language in later statute as was used in earlier statute in pari materia be suggestive of intention of Legislature-
S.No | Case | Held |
1 | R. V Oxford Shire | The language is plainly derived from the judicial pronouncements and earlier legislation on acquisition of rights by prescription. To put the words in their |
2 | Lalu Prasad Yadav & | 38. In Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar [AIR 1955 SC 661 : (1955) 2 SCR 603] Venkatarama Ayyar, J. observed: (AIR p. 749, para 197) "197. ... It is a |
3 | State Of Madhya | In the first place, the earlier schemes specifically provided that "traditional industries" were out- side their purview. The language of the notification, which is a piece |
4 | Commissioner Of | 19. In our opinion, Heydon's mischief rule is applicable to the present case. Under that we have to see the mischief in the old law and find out the mischief which the |
5 | R.V. Price reported at | "I think that when the legislature, in legislating in pari materia and substituting certain provision in that Act for those which existed in the earlier statute, |